Review and conclusions based on use with Firmware v1.0. Currently the Lumix GH5 allows you to shoot Cinema 4K (4096 x 2160) at 60p with a bit rate of 150Mbps, while Full HD video is obviously also possible, up to a very impressive 180p. @lefcop What's your opinion on the m43 small sensor size and pro filmmaking in terms of the final result? Indeed - there are smaller and lighter options for micro 4/3 and other mirrorless. I'm not a pro filmmaker by any means, but I've done a bunch of acclaimed indie films, one of them even got me interviewed on a prestigious national talk show. Nowadays scifi special effects, 3d anmation etc, dominate so many films, that for for me it has become humdrum even though I was totally into holography and 3D animation since it began, making my own holograms and later learning Softimage 3D and earlier software since the beginning of Personal Computing. "new sample values between two previously recorded sample points"Correction : when saying "two", I had audio in mind. 11th March 2019 Panasonic Lumix LX100 II Review. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I am so fickle about what to buy right now, but I just sold my gh4 and will buy one of these on the 21st. For many users, the addition of in-body stabilization and 4K video without cropping might be enough to make the camera a worthwhile upgrade, but Panasonic has revised and improved almost every aspect of the camera's behavior and performance. DFD is a great system. I know it is amazing with video, but I am not so sure if it will satisfy my needs in photography. Yes it can be harder to focus with a shallower DOF but for background isolation its better. Would love to hear your experiences and how they compare. Panasonic S1R Review A powerful new mirrorless contender for pro photographers with deep pockets... Amy Davies | April 25, 2019 3:36 pm BST. I didn't like Revenant anyway, but thats a good example of a digital look I can't stand. Oh, and it's a lot of fun too. Let’s find out together! https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/nikon-d810-with-iso-64-32.494930/. Panasonic should know better then to use just contrast AF. As a video camera with rolling shutter issues, $2K doesn't really class it as a bargain either, although it's more competitive. 25p, but didn't do an in-depth test, just I did think it was better than the GH4 while I was using it. Beyond that, you just have to use your reasoning power since it would be virtually impossible for a site like DPReview to constantly reevaluate cameras and an "absolute scale" is not possible when looking at features because next year some camera will come up with a "must have" feature that nobody ever thought of before. 3rd October 2018. Ahh, April: the beginning of Spring. @MichaelKJ, I'd like to provide a go on your comment. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional productions or A-camera for amateur and independent productions. Finding a camera that does both at very good level is amazingly hard too. The sun starts to come out after a long winter, flowers are blooming and bears come out of hibernation. This, combined with faster sensor readout, should mean faster and more accurate autofocus. Ah,if anyone else is interested got the answer from another forum. At this year's CP+ show in Yokohama, Japan, we talked in-depth with Panasonic about the company's new Lumix G9 and GH5S cameras and its increased emphasis on stills capture as well as high-quality 4K video. We're essentially getting a consumer camera that beats what George Lucas had several years ago with his unlimited Hollywood powers. We contacted Panasonic and the company clarified that it had planned to include 48p on the camera, but that it's not currently implemented. What's the deal with the high ISO Jpeg detail? When I say "all" be sure to assume it's not LITERALLY all, will ya? 16th April 2019. Take a look at some of that month's highlights. On a side note, I'm always planning to go back to film for my still photography :D It always remains a "maybe in the future" kind of thing, but the idea never fades away. Besides, what other features can they add to their cameras these days? If you want to live the passion like I do; lately I got a few reels of Ilford FP4. I think they need to go for more niches, stop being kitchen sink salesmen, and stop using camera forums to design their products for them ;-). The Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 is the fifth in the company's industry-changing video and stills 'hybrid' lineup. Check out the winners of the 2020 DPReview Awards! The GH5's feature set moves on suitably far from its predecessor that the company says the GH4 will remain in its lineup as a lower-cost option for users who don't need the additional capability that the GH5 brings. Other people cannot look past sensorsize as much as some people cannot look beyond the colour of someones skin it seems. The pricing policy of camera companies is their problem, but there is no innate reason why you cannot make specialised versions of the same basic components and products, but tune them for different users. This is important enough for anybody interested in or using GH5. Panasonic offers a wonderful mirrorless camera designed to meet the needs of the most demanding videographers. The gx850 also supports auto ISO in manual mode. If you don't use video, you just are not in the target segment of GH-5. From a pragmatic approach when production has a decent budget, it will rent an Arri/Red/BM. Em1.2 is just a tiny bit less fast and less decisive but with some lenses (I think 20 mm f1.7) the difference IS notable. +++. But even before you grab your GH5, can you tell us a bit more about the FS5? I would say many video pros use GH4/5 as this camera is the minimum that one can use with cinema productions -- with the dci 4k. This interview Joseph did with a Panasonic rep back in February mentioned the codec, but he never said that ALL-I will give better image quality, just much larger files and better to edit with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51CDeENsmpQ&list=PLRe8DcOhgsloChzSSPPOkHDPCrUoffqKc&index=2. Interesting thread here. A few of the best most particular filmmakers still insist on using film. If you want that take a look at what Black Magic makes. Great camera, but IMHO, the GH5 is just in a class by itself. The DSLR form factor offers a lot of advantages over "traditional" video cameras: interchangeable lenses, good ergonomics and a more incognito look. The biggest problem is a fundamental lack of imagination, not technology. Hardwired prejudice. The existing tests may contradict because the subjects involve different light conditions or contrasts. While Panasonic is marketing the Lumix GH5 at both pro videographers and enthusiast photographers, most units are probably going to fall into the hands of the former, and as such it's no surprise to see the GH5 sporting an impressive movie spec. In fact, considered by many as the best hybrids in the industry. A high performance still photo mirrorless camera relies on advanced video technology to work at all, so you won't save any money to just remove one button and one menu, plus lose the economies of scale on small production runs. What exactly is "casual action shooting?". wouldn't that be controlled in your editing software? I did get the Vlog update to the GH5. Is it noisy at ISO 1000 ? A list of the changes added in firmware v2.0 is included and we hope to test these features soon. A fixed screen is bad enough (i'm looking at you Canon), but a tilting one is almost as restrictive. You can have it without for under 1,000 USD / EUR. A bit of GH5 footage (including the unedited out-of-camera footage - linked from the video's description) for those who wants to see how the IQ is changing when VFR is used: https://youtu.be/vSCJdLlJ3Bw. Better EVF, easier to learn with better menu's according to most people. For an untrained eye, maybe the images produced could easily pass as Hollywood quality. Fujifilm's 3.00 firmware update adds a new Pixel Shift Mult-Shot mode to its GFX 100 camera that works alongside a new Pixel Shift Combiner program to output 400MP Raw images made up from 16 individual still images. We have a camera running the new firmware so will test it as soon as we have a moment. With attachments such as the DMW-XLR1 accessory microphone unit, the GH5 promises to be a great tool for video enthusiasts and pros. When we first reported on the alleged ransomware attack back in August, Canon said it was 'investigating the situation.' The premium Panasonic is asking for the GH5 is for its video functions so it would be a waste to purchase it to use on stills alone. Panasonic's goal was to match the IBS capabilities of the GH5, and it succeeded. Regarding the the point in time scoring system. The GH5 falls directly in the center of this price scheme. Our article gives a full review on the Panasonic GH5 including specs, lenses and comparison with its predecessor the Panasonic Gh4. Sign up to get breaking news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more, plus the hottest tech deals! Would it hurt video quality? The G85 doesn't even allow ISO 100 for video, which is ridiculous, especially when you're a newbie trying to shoot video in the middle of the day in Miami without an ND filter! They either suck at one or another. Hybrid devices are the future most especially at the consumer space just look at the smart phone. May because there are a lot of people that look at all the specs and how they translate into reality, than look what is out there on the market that can compare and have to conclude that at that price and size there is nothing. The Canon RF 800mm F11's unique combination of telephoto reach, affordability and light weight will likely enable even more people to do the same. I have 3 m4/3 cameras, and a bunch of good lenses, so switching systems just doesn't make sense monetarily. OK at most things but not great at anything. Did Nikon charge less whe they released the still focused DF? The 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN share similar designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies. Panasonic Lumix GH5 review Blurring the lines between stills and video By Phil Hall 22 November 2018. Can you color grade it and make it fake looking as well? The BMPCC and BMMCC are both using super 16 sized sensors (smaller than m43), but directors of photography on movie sets are using them for feature films. If you're allowing the sensor to eat up more photons per exposure (say base ISO 25 vs ISO 200), you're allowing the shadows to be rendered with more signal, leading to much cleaner shadows (which in my opinion is a m4/3's video output biggest problem, noisy shadows). This Panasonic GH4 review will show you exactly why you should consider it for your next compact camera purchase. If you don't want the second device, then it isn't cheaper and you have a less optimised device. I had a GH3 too but have "downsized" to GX8 (primarily stills) and G85 (primarily video). I think 4k 60p should have an option for 200 mbps, which can easily be handled by 30 MBps minimum memory cards. Nowadays I can't stand IMAX, or 3D, especially if it was digital to begin with so I pass on all that. I noticed that I can no longer get CS6 Adobe Photoshop to read the .rw2 raw file from the GH5. You shouldn't have to re-encode the clip. I've shot on video cameras that cost tens of thousands of dollars. You can stop down lenses, but then you gather less light and you end up with almost the same IQ of m4/3, all while using larger lenses, having a larger sensor to cool down and stabilize... All things being equal FF is more capable, but first you gotta have all things equal. Are we only allowed to write posts we hate ourselves for writing? @Dragonrider said: " 1. the hybrid attracts a diverse customer base (and is attractive to anyone "moving up" from a phone.". So you say you can't turn the tilting screen to face you if you're filming yourself, or if you're holding the camera over your head?)))) Anyway, many thanks to you and all the other respondents for your feedback, which is what I asked for. Oh wait, that's what we have now. Video and stills use the same technology, but the way in which they exploit that technology is different. For example, the D800 is a tad more fragile in the highlights, so ISO 50 must be used with caution. Read honest and unbiased product reviews … 30fps looks smooth on 90% of LCD panels, as most run at 60Hz regardless of power supply freq. Conclusion. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Panasonic VYK6T25 Cup ... 2019. Review and conclusions based on use with Firmware v1.0. They love it except the battery life is not that great and it overheats after 2-3 hours. Senior Editor Barney Britton's Gear of the Year part two details how he ended up with a Reflex-Nikkor 1000mm F11, and despite its quirks, why it was ideal for a creative project in the COVID-era. DPs chose their film stock by the aesthetics that particular film gives. Video C-AF is far better, it has 4K 60P, meaning, you can show your video on a Q or UHD notebook with zero judder, and it's as clean as hell... Also, the Mark II "file splits" 4K video, 4GB max file size, meaning you have to join it up in post, and it has a 30 minute limit...the GH5 shares none of those afflictions. But you can't realistically use that Sigma over ISO 200, and the stills frame rate capacity of either Panasonic is much greater. One of the benefits of mirrorless is they are smaller due to lacking a mirror. Is the Panasonic GH5 mirrorless camera still worth it in 2019? You want to get some good shots from an action situation but your livelihood isn't dependent on it. Albert Fast: A video about the Panasonic GH5 was inevitable. For me. This means it will be possible to extract 18MP still images (at either 4:3 or 3:2 ratios) from ultra-high-quality video footage at 30fps at an unlimited burst rate. Thus there is no question that a Sigma camera using the best Sigma lenses would handily beat a Panasonic camera. It all looks too "staged", too shiny, too fake, too refined (which can be a bad thing). Lots of good films are digital. The Panasonic Lumix GH5 delivers incredible ergonomics; a thoughtful menu system that's easy to handle and has a strong performance with excellent battery life. My current m4/3 camera, the GX8, with 12-35mm and 35-100mm f/2.8 weigh about the same as the D810 that I sold, body only.